New report shows EU funding of anti-Israel NGOs like BDS
рус   |   eng
Search
Sign in   Register
Help |  RSS |  Subscribe
Euroasian Jewish News
    World Jewish News
      Analytics
        Activity Leadership Partners
          Mass Media
            Xenophobia Monitoring
              Reading Room
                Contact Us

                  World Jewish News

                  New report shows EU funding of anti-Israel NGOs like BDS

                  Prof. Gerald Steinberg, NGO Monitor President: ''The EU refusal to release any significant documents that shed light on funding decisions reflects a clear violation of transparency principles, and allows for highly irresponsible EC actions."

                  New report shows EU funding of anti-Israel NGOs like BDS

                  13.06.2013, Israel and the World

                  According to NGO Monitor, EU funds are going to organizations involved in anti-Israel boycotts and violent demonstrations, which, it says, "undermine the EU's efforts to secure peace in the Middle East."
                  In a new report presented to members of the European Parliament, NGO Monitor, a Jerusalem-based organization founded to promote critical debate and accountability regarding the political activities of non-governmental organizations, details the damaging impact of highly secretive EU funding for radical political advocacy NGOs.
                  The report, titled Lack of Due Diligence and Transparency in European Union Funding for Radical NGOs,‘’ shows how EU-funded NGOs lead the campaigns to demonize Israel through the boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS), actions that totally contradict the EU's proclaimed objectives of supporting peace and democratic development, according to NGO Monitor.
                  "The EU's grantees are centrally involved in the 2001 Durban NGO Forum's strategy of political warfare and demonization of Israel. The Coalition of Women for Peace (CWP) and its allies are driving Europe's double standards that single-out Israel through product labeling," said Prof. Gerald Steinberg, president of NGO Monitor.
                  "The EU refusal to release any significant documents that shed light on funding decisions reflects a clear violation of transparency principles, and allows for highly irresponsible EC actions."
                  Several examples of misdirected and unsupervised funding are examined in the NGO Monitor report such as :
                  Coalition of Women for Peace (CWP) received funding from the European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights (EIDHR) ("Empowering Women, Building Peace" €247,668) and from the PfP -- Partnership for Peace ("Addressing Fear: Strengthening the Nonviolent Alternative" €355,130). CWP is a leader in BDS and demonization campaigns, and in sponsoring "Nakba Day" activities that amplify the Palestinian narrative. CWP's partners in the PfP grant include the Palestinian Popular Struggle Coordination Committee (PSCC), which organized protests that have often turned violent, and Nova, a radical Spanish political NGO.
                  As the report details, CWP's agenda is also reflected in the participation of its activists in demonstrations carrying flags of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP), listed by the EU as a terrorist organization.
                  "The study emphasizes the fundamental damage caused by extreme secrecy and the lack of due diligence in the European Commission's decision-making for funding radical NGOs," said Steinberg.
                  "The facts clearly demonstrate that either the officials involved were unaware of the groups chosen to receive taxpayer funds, or that they chose to promote NGOs that fuel the conflict and promote confrontation, under the façade of 'non-violence.'"
                  The EU report follows an NGO Monitor report presented in Washington in May on US government funding for several Middle East political NGOs. On the basis of this publication, members of Congress and US Government officials took action to insure transparency prevent the misallocation of such grants for counterproductive NGOs.

                  EJP